Dehydration & Starvation – Myths & Realities PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 11 May 2010 18:05

There are many misunderstandings regarding the need for food and fluids at the end of life.  The following information will hopefully help seniors and their families make more informed choices regarding the type of care they desire.


The following are commonly heard statements regarding the need for food and fluids as we approach the end-of-life.

1. “Dehydration & starvation are painful.”
2. “Providing IV (intravenous) fluids will make a terminally ill person more comfortable.”
3. “We cannot allow someone to starve to death.”

We all know that healthy people who don’t eat or drink adequately become hungry, thirsty, and uncomfortable. But, in studies with volunteers dying from different diseases (e.g., cancer, congestive heart failure, oxygen-dependent emphysema, kidney failure, dementia), dehydration & malnourishment were not shown to be painful. The lack of food and water actually promoted comfort because of chemical changes that occurred in the body and in the brain.

For folks who are actively dying (as in the last week or two of life), the artificial (i.e., intravenous) administration of fluids usually causes discomfort. The lungs retain water, the bladder fills more often and wants to be emptied, the brain is more aware of pain, and the sensation of hunger is enhanced.

By interfering in this final stage of life, by altering this normal chemical process, artificial hydration delays death and prolongs suffering.  If we allow “nature to take its course”, almost everyone who is terminally ill and is unable to swallow fluids will die within two to ten days. If we supply artificial fluids through an IV, this can take weeks.

It is helpful for families to remember that it is the disease that causes a person to die, not dehydration or starvation from the withholding of fluids or food. Consequently, “starvation” is the incorrect term to use in cases of terminal illness. Prior to the medical inventions of intravenous lines and feeding tubes, people died of “natural causes” and were not thought of as “starving to death”.

Thus, at the very end of life: (1) dehydration & starvation are not painful, (2) providing IV fluids does not keep a terminally ill person more comfortable, (3) IV fluid administration can prolong death, and (4) a dying person does not “starve” to death. As a loved one declines, everyone—families, friends, seniors, doctors, and nurses—can be reassured that if the choice is made to avoid artificial interventions, “nature” will take its course and proceed as intended, peacefully.




1. Ng K. Symptoms and attitudes of 100 consecutive patients admitted to an acute hospice/palliative care unit. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998.
2. McCann R, et al. Comfort care for terminally ill patients. JAMA. 1994.
3. McGeer A, et al. Parenteral nutrition in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med. 1989.
4. Fainsinger R. The management of dehydration in terminally ill patients. J Palliat Care. 1994.


Last Updated on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:57


0 #5 labor 2014-04-12 18:40
I do not know whether it's just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing problems with your site.
It appears as if some of the written text within your content are running off the screen.
Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well?
This may be a issue with my web browser because I've had this
happen before. Thank you
0 #4 oreck air purifier 2014-04-11 11:20
Hi to every single one, it's actually a pleasant for me to go to see this site, it contains useful Information.
0 #3 wifi password 2014-03-24 23:24
The objective is to get the maximum wireless signal to your computer.
11ac is to buy two devices, a router and either a media
bridge or another router to connect with wired Gigabit Ethernet.

However, people are positive about its future and it won.
0 #2 cares 2014-02-25 18:02
Ask a starving child. I have been watching good care starve my father, while great care dehydrated mom to death. If the brain starves, that is torture, go to the third world. Death can be peaceful but mostly it is a struggle, sometimes horrible struggle. Please save me the platitudes and shoddy science. If we can help someone not starve and not be shoddy in science, then perhaps "peace", but having ones entire body self canniblize, is bad science. We need to revise our thinking and science. Imagine saying, third world children are so happy when the die. Our science is shoddy. Death is nasty, and in our world, but fighting for it with better science is the way to go, not the way of starvation.
0 #1 Norv Blake 2014-02-10 14:29
Thank you so very much for this insight article. Excellent follow up to NY TIMES PIECE. We are finally moving out of The MIDDLE AGES in our thinking on this subject. Thanks again.

Add comment

Security code